Case Studies

Case Study: People, Process, and Technology Transformation saving $150M annually

 

Executive Summary: A Fortune 500 company faced the pressing challenge of reducing $1 billion in annual expenses related to maintaining their facilities and ensuring equipment functionality. The existing systems were outdated and overly customized, lacking proper data capture for effective analysis. The manual processes led to inefficiencies, longer resolution times, and a reactive culture. To address these issues, a comprehensive 18-month strategy was developed, resulting in an investment of $15 million and projected annual savings of $150 million.

 

Background: The company's facility management was hampered by old systems that did not meet the analytical needs for identifying performance issues. The manual and highly customized processes contributed to increased costs and delays in service resolution. Additionally, the lack of a clear organizational structure hindered ownership and accountability among staff and vendor partners.

 

Objectives:

1.      Reduce annual facility maintenance and equipment operation expenses of $1 billion.

2.      Transition from manual processes to automated systems.

3.      Enhance data capture and reporting to facilitate informed decision-making.

4.      Foster a culture of accountability and proactivity within the organization.

 

Methodology:

  1. Off-Site Executive Meeting:

    • Conducted to align the vision for the facility management transformation.

    • Focused on identifying key performance indicators and desired outcomes.

  2. Strategic Planning:

    • Developed a comprehensive 18-month strategy encompassing all aspects of facility management.

    • Engaged a cross-functional team to outline specific steps and engage stakeholders.

  3. Organizational Restructuring:

    • Created a new organizational structure outlining clear roles and responsibilities.

    • Ensured accountability at every level to promote ownership and proactive behavior.

  4. Process Redesign:

    • Removed manual processes through automation and implemented standardized procedures.

    • Defined data requirements for accurate reporting and analytics.

  5. System Implementation:

    • Rolled out new technology systems to automate processes, enabling better data collection and analysis.

    • Ensured transparency and visibility of performance metrics for all stakeholders.

Results:

o    Investment: $15 million in project costs.

o    Savings: Anticipated $150 million in annual savings post-implementation.

o    User Engagement: Implementation reached 300,000 end users, enhancing overall efficiency and communication across departments.

 

Conclusion: The systematic approach towards redefining the facility management operations resulted in substantial savings and a cultural shift toward accountability. By investing in new systems and processes, the company positioned itself for sustained financial and operational performance, ultimately transforming from a reactive to a proactive organization. This case study underscores the importance of strategic planning and cross-functional collaboration in large-scale organizational transformations.

 

Case Study: Transforming Project Management and Results for a Fortune 500 Company

 

Executive Summary: A Fortune 500 company faced significant challenges in delivering strategic priorities, leading to frustration among stakeholders and internal partners. The lack of a cohesive project management structure resulted in manual inefficiencies, lost capital budget dollars, and diminished confidence in the project team. An assessment revealed inadequate governance, untrained staff, and an absence of a standardized project management methodology. Following a comprehensive analysis, a transformative strategy was initiated, yielding remarkable improvements in productivity and stakeholder satisfaction.

 

Background: The company struggled to launch new technology projects, causing a ripple effect

of dissatisfaction among stakeholders. Each of the three operating companies had their own project teams but lacked coordination, leading to inconsistent project execution and unclear requirements for technical teams. The result was a chaotic environment devoid of accountability, governance, or trained project managers.

 

Objectives:

1.      Streamline project management processes across all operating companies.

2.      Establish a centralized Project Management Office (PMO) for standardized governance.

3.      Improve project intake processes and enhance stakeholder confidence.

4.      Increase overall productivity and client satisfaction.

 

Methodology:

  1. Assessment Phase:

    • Conducted a thorough assessment to identify key pain points within the project management framework.

    • Highlighted the lack of process for project intake, prioritization, and accountability.

  2. Report of Findings:

    • Delivered findings to Executive Leaders detailing the need for a full-scale transformation in project management practices.

    • Recommended establishing a centralized PMO to unify project efforts across the three operating companies.

  3. Organizational Restructuring:

    • Developed a new organizational structure, clearly defining job descriptions, roles, and responsibilities.

    • Required all existing project management staff to apply and interview for positions in the new structure, ensuring only qualified applicants were selected.

  4. Project Management Training:

    • Collaborated with a local university to design and implement comprehensive project management training for all business, PMO, and technology employees.

    • Required attendance to foster alignment and clarify roles and responsibilities.

  5. Governance Committee Establishment:

    • Formed a governance committee comprising executive leaders to oversee project intake, approvals, prioritization, status updates, and PMO performance metrics.

  6. Vendor Contract Consolidation:

    • Reviewed and consolidated existing vendor contracts across the three operating companies to negotiate better terms and pricing, eliminating redundancies.

Results:

o   Productivity Improvement: The restructured PMO resulted in a 300% increase in overall productivity.

o   Stakeholder Satisfaction: Achieved a 100% client and partner satisfaction score following project management improvements.

o   Staff Optimization: Realized a 42% reduction in staff, streamlining operations while enhancing performance.

o   Operational Alignment: Centralized project management led to consistent governance and accountability across all operating units.

 

Conclusion: The successful transformation of project management practices within this Fortune 500 company underscored the importance of structured governance, standardized processes, and comprehensive training. By addressing core issues and centralizing project management under a new PMO, the organization not only enhanced productivity but also restored confidence among stakeholders and internal partners. This case study serves as a testament to the value of strategic organizational change in overcoming operational challenges.

 

 

Case Study: Organizational Transformation of IT Leadership for Enhanced Performance

 

Executive Summary: Upon the appointment of a new Chief Information Officer (CIO), a comprehensive assessment was conducted to evaluate the IT leadership team, organizational design, capabilities, processes, and employee satisfaction. The findings revealed critical operational gaps, including the absence of key services such as Vendor Management, Resource Planning, Capacity Management, Metrics & KPI Reporting, Business Process Engineering, and Process Automation. To address these challenges, a transformative strategy was implemented, which not only established these essential services but also delivered an impressive $1.04 million in hard savings within the first six weeks of execution.

 

Background: The newly appointed CIO recognized a pressing need for a robust assessment of the IT organization to identify inefficiencies and areas for improvement. The assessment illuminated significant overlaps in roles, unclear priorities, communication gaps, and the absence of essential IT operational services. This lack of structure contributed to high employee turnover and dissatisfaction, particularly due to inadequate career development opportunities.

 

Objectives:

  1. Streamline organizational design to clarify roles and responsibilities.

  2. Establish key IT operational services to enhance overall organizational effectiveness.

  3. Develop clear career paths and growth opportunities for employees.

  4. Improve communication and transparency regarding projects and vendor management.

  5. Create a cost-effective Project Management Office (PMO) structure focusing on customer experience and business value.

Methodology:

  1. Assessment and Findings:

    • Conducted an in-depth assessment to evaluate leadership effectiveness, organizational design, and employee satisfaction.

    • Identified the absence of essential operational services, including Vendor Management, Resource Planning, Capacity Management, Metrics & KPI Reporting, Business Process Engineering, and Process Automation.

  2. New Organizational Design:

    • Developed a new organizational structure that delineated job families and responsibilities, establishing clear roles for newly created services.

    • Introduced essential functions that were previously non-existent, such as:

      • Vendor Management: Established processes for vendor oversight, performance evaluation, and contractual compliance.

      • Resource Planning: Created methodologies for effectively allocating and managing IT resources.

      • Capacity Management: Implemented strategies to ensure optimal use of IT infrastructure and resources.

      • Metrics & KPI Reporting: Designed frameworks for ongoing performance measurement and reporting.

      • Business Process Engineering and Process Automation: Developed processes to streamline operations and enhance efficiency through automation.

  3. Partnership for Benchmarking:

    • Collaborated with an external firm to benchmark roles, market compensation, and establish appropriate grading systems to align with industry standards.

  4. Compensation Matrix Development:

    • Created a compensation matrix to promote equity across roles, ensuring consistency and fairness in employee remuneration.

  5. Career Pathing Matrix Implementation:

    • Developed a career pathing matrix empowering employees with visibility into the skills and experiences required for advancement, fostering career growth.

  6. Executive Dashboard Reporting:

    • Implemented an executive portfolio and project dashboard, providing transparency into project status, aligning strategic priorities, and enhancing accountability.

  7. PMO Structure Optimization:

    • Established a cost-effective PMO centered on delivering customer experiences, value to the business, and ensuring expedited project completion.

  8. Organizational Change Management:

    • Developed change management and communication strategies to prepare staff for the organizational changes and facilitate smooth adoption.

Results:

o   Enhanced Clarity and Structure: The new organizational design established clear roles, particularly for newly created services, reducing overlaps and improving team alignment.

o   Operational Improvements: The introduction of critical IT operational services resulted in better vendor management, resource allocation, and capacity planning, leading to enhanced efficiency.

o   Hard Savings: Within the first six weeks of implementation, the organization realized $1.04 million in hard savings, highlighting the effectiveness of the changes.

o   Career Development: Visibility into career pathways increased employee satisfaction and reduced turnover as staff recognized opportunities for growth.

o   Improved Communication: Transparency in project reporting improved communication from leadership and within teams, ensuring alignment with strategic priorities.

o   Performance Measurement: The development of Metrics & KPI Reporting enabled ongoing performance assessment and informed decision-making.

Conclusion: The transformation undertaken by the CIO and the IT organization successfully addressed fundamental operational gaps and established a more efficient, responsive, and engaged workforce. By introducing critical IT operational services and mitigating core issues related to leadership, communication, and employee development, the organization positioned itself for sustained growth, enhanced performance, and significant cost savings. This case study exemplifies the impact of strategic organizational change in fostering a culture of accountability, transparency, and continuous improvement within an IT department.

 

Case Study: Successful Implementation of a $39M Consolidation Initiative

 

Executive Summary: A multi-year development initiative aimed at consolidating portfolio, program, and project management processes across 17 business units was initiated with a budget of $39 million. The project, which had faced multiple failed attempts and a significant data breach, aimed to achieve $40 million in savings in expenses and capital within the first year. By redefining project governance, establishing clear roles, and implementing comprehensive change management strategies, the initiative was successfully delivered, transforming management practices and onboarding thousands of users into a new software suite.

 

Background: The organization had attempted to consolidate its project management processes several times without success. A critical point of failure was the outdated system responsible for a major data breach, leading to the write-off of millions of dollars due to stalled progress and the need to restart the project. Recognizing the urgency to implement a solution, the newly appointed project leader assumed responsibility for revitalizing the effort.

 

Objectives:

  1. Successfully implement a consolidated portfolio, program, and project management process across 17 business units.

  2. Achieve $40 million in expense and capital savings in the first year.

  3. Effectively onboard 1,000 internal HQ clients and 3,000 external vendors into a new software suite.

  4. Decommission 7 obsolete software solutions to streamline operations.

Methodology:

  1. Assessment and Understanding:

    • Conducted meetings with the executive steering committee, key stakeholders, and the project team to gain insight into the existing challenges and frustrations.

    • Identified critical issues such as unclear roles and responsibilities, lack of alignment across work streams, and insufficient accountability and decision-making processes.

  2. Project Organization:

    • Restructured the project team, defining workstream owners with clear roles and responsibilities to enhance accountability and empower decision-making.

    • Established a framework for collaboration across different work streams, promoting alignment toward common objectives.

  3. Executive Steering Committee Engagement:

    • Instituted regular meetings for the Executive Steering Committee, focusing on providing objective and measurable project updates.

    • Created a platform for openly sharing project risks, issues, and challenges, encouraging leadership guidance and assistance where needed.

  4. Change Management and Training:

    • Developed and implemented effective change management, training, and communication strategies to support the project launch.

    • Designed tailored training programs for both internal clients and external vendors to ensure user readiness for the new software suite.

  5. Software Implementation:

    • Successfully onboarded 1,000 internal HQ clients and 3,000 external vendors to the new software suite as part of the cut-over strategy.

    • Decommissioned 7 obsolete software solutions, reducing complexity and enhancing system efficiency.

 

Results:

o   Successful Project Delivery: The initiative was successfully delivered within the projected timelines, overcoming previous challenges.

o   Significant Savings: The consolidation project is expected to yield $40 million in savings in expense and capital during the first year.

o   Increased User Adoption: Effective change management facilitated the smooth onboarding of all intended users to the new system, significantly enhancing operational efficiency.

o   Streamlined Operations: The decommissioning of 7 outdated software solutions resulted in optimized workflows and reduced operational costs.

o   Enhanced Governance: Clear roles and regular updates ensured strong project governance and transparency, fostering stakeholder confidence and engagement.

Conclusion: The successful implementation of the $39 million consolidation initiative exemplifies the importance of effective project governance and change management in overcoming previous failures. By establishing clear roles, fostering accountability, and engaging stakeholders throughout the process, the organization was able to achieve significant savings and successfully modernize its project management approach. This case study highlights the transformative impact of strategic leadership and thorough planning in driving organizational success.